stl - Absense of standardized naming convention in the C++ "standard" -
is me or "standard" c++ library totally absent of uniformity when comes naming conventions?
there underscore_identifiers, there many undecoratedidentifiers, there capitalized std::ios_base::init
, there stl classes in lowercase, other oddities.
how can mess of naming conventions classified standard, logical paradox...
why isn't naming convention enforced?
how can mess of naming conventions classified standard[?]
standard-ness orthogonal neatness, unfortunately.
why isn't naming convention enforced?
well, you've never been on committee!
Comments
Post a Comment